SUBHASH BHATI vs THE STATE GOVT.OF NCT OF DELHI

Judgment text excerpt

$~5&6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 22.04.2025 + BAIL APPLN. 4394/2024 SUBHASH BHATI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. P. Pratap Singh and Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate versus THE STATE GOVT.OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC with Mr. Abhijeet Kumar, Advocate for State ASI Sachin Singh, PS Crime Branch + BAIL APPLN. 4625/2024 USMAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. P. Pratap Singh and Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate versus THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Richa Dhawan, APP for State with ASI Sachin Singh, PS Crime Branch CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. In furtherance of last order, learned counsel for accused/applicants submits that they have no document at all, reflecting any business Bail Applications No. 4394/2024 & 4625/2024 Page 1 of 4 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH GIRISH KATHPALIA KATHPALIA Date: 2025.04.22 18:36:38 -07'00' Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:22.04.2025 19:01:07 transaction between them. On last date, after part submissions, learned counsel for accused/applicants had taken adjournment to produce some reliable material in support of his contention that accused Usman, Pravez and Shuaib were co-villagers and had business transactions, and the accused/applicant Subhash Bhati being a cloth merchant, he also had business transactions with the remaining accused persons. Learned counsel for accused/applicants is offered more time to obtain and place on record documents reflecting the alleged business transactions, but he expresses his inability to avail the offer, stating that the transactions were of petty business, so they do not have any document. 2. Under these circumstances, I have heard learned counsel for accused/