STATE vs MANISH YADAV

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 08.04.2025 CRL.REV.P. 184/2017 STATE .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State along with SI Aarti Yadav, PS kapashera. versus MANISH YADAV .....Respondent Through: Respondent with his counsel Mr. H.S Yadav and Pradeep Yadav, Advs. CRL.REV.P. 836/2017 SMT KIRAN MISHRA .....Petitioner Through: Counsel (appearance not given). versus STATE & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State along with SI Aarti Yadav, PS kapashera. Respondent No. 2 with his counsel Mr. H.S Yadav and Pradeep Yadav, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA JUDGMENT CRL.REV.P. 184/2017 & connected matter 1. By way of the present petitions, the State as well as the prosecutrix, seeks setting aside of the order dated 02.12.2016 [hereafter „impugned order‟] passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-SFTC, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi, [hereafter „learned ASJ’], whereby the accused Manish Yadav had been discharged of the offences punishable under Section 376/506/323 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [hereafter „IPC’]. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the present case are that the pr