STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION & ANR. vs BHAVNA

Judgment text excerpt

$~77 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 04.04.2025 + W.P.(C) 4340/2025 STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Ms.Saumya Tandon, CGSC, Mr.Prakhar Mani Tripathi, Adv versus BHAVNA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Meenu Sharma, Ms.Vaishali Sulkhan, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGAR NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (Oral) CM APPL. 20070/2025 (Exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 4340/2025 and CM APPL. 20069/2025 2. This petition has been filed, challenging the Order dated 20.08.2024 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘learned Tribunal’), setting aside the finding of the Review Medical Board which declared the respondent ‘unfit’ for appointment and further directing a fresh Review Medical Board to be constituted and appropriate orders to be passed on the basis of the outcome of such fresh medical examination, within a period of twelve weeks of the Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed WP(C) 4340/2025 Page 1 of 5 By:RENUKA NEGI Signing Date:07.04.2025 20:14:39 petitioners receiving a certified copy of the Impugned Order. 3. Briefly stated, the respondent had applied for appointment to the post of Constable (Executive), pursuant to the Advertisement issued by the petitioners for the post of Constable (Executive) Male & Female in Delhi Police Examination-2023 on 01.09.2023. 4. Having cleared the various stages of selection, she appeared before the Detailed Medical Examination (in short, ‘DME’). In the DME, however, she was declared ‘unfit’ for appointment with the remarks ‘little finger of left hand amputated and hypertension (147/100mmhg)’. 5. Aggrieved thereof, the respondent appeared for the Review