STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION AND ORS. vs GAURAV SHARAVAT AND ANR

Judgment text excerpt

$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 25.04.2025 + W.P.(C) 1966/2025 STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ankit Raj, Senior Panel Counsel Union of India, Mr. Ali Mohammed Khan, Mr. Vikram Kumar, Ms. Insha, Advs. versus GAURAV SHARAVAT AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Esha Mazumdar and Ms. Muskan Sharma, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGAR NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (Oral) CM APPL. 24432/2025 1. This application seeks an early hearing of the writ petition. 2. With the consent of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the application is allowed, and the matter is taken up for hearing today itself. 3. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 1966/2025 Signature Not Verified Signed By:VIJAYA WP(C) 1966/2025 Page 1 of 6 LAKSHMI DOBHAL Signing Date:30.04.2025 17:53:03 4. This Petition has been filed by the petitioners, challenging the Order dated 22.03.2024 passed by Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as ‘Tribunal’) in Original Application (O.A.) No. 432/2024 titled Punit Kumar and Ors. v. Staff Selection Commission and Ors., allowing the said O.A. along with the other batch petitions with the following directions:- “16. CONCLUSION 16.1 The present OA(s) are accordingly disposed of with a direction to the Competent authority amongst the respondents to conduct a fresh medical examination of the applicant (s) by way of constituting an appropriate medical board (the composition of which should include three ophthalmologists. In case of women candidates, one of the ophthalmologists should be women) in any government medical hospital except the Hospital which has already conducted the initial and the review medical examination. 16.2