SSC & ORS. vs ANKUSH

Judgment text excerpt

$~98 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 07.04.2025 + W.P.(C) 14044/2024 SSC & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms.Rukhmini Bobde, CGSC, Mr.Jatin Dhmija, Mr.Amlaan Kumar, Mr.Vinayak Aren, Advs. versus ANKUSH .....Respondent Through: Ms.Esha Mazumdar, Ms.Muskhan Sharma, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGAR NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (Oral) CM APPL. 58853/2024 1. This application has been filed seeking permission to file the additional documents on record. 2. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. The documents are taken on record. W.P.(C) 14044/2024 & CM APPL. 58776/2024 3. This petition has been filed, challenging the Order dated 15.04.2024 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed WP(C) 14044/2024 Page 1 of 4 By:RENUKA NEGI Signing Date:10.04.2025 18:34:44 Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the „learned Tribunal‟) in O.A. No.1535/2024 titled Ankush v. Staff Selection Company and Ors., which, on the basis of O.A. 519/2024, titled Teekaram Singh Meena v. Staff Selection Commission & Others, directed the petitioners to have the respondent medically re-examined at any Government Hospital other than to one where the Detailed Medical Examination (in short, „DME‟) and the Review Medical Examination (in short, „RME‟) of the respondent was earlier conducted. 4. The respondent had applied for the post of Constable (Executive) (Male) pursuant to the Advertisement dated 01.09.2023 issued by the petitioners for the recruitment to the said post. 5. Having cleared the initial stages of selection, the respondent appeared before the DME on 22.01.2024, which declared him „unfit‟ for recruitment with the following remarks: “1) Ri