Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-04-09

SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. 144 of 2025 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. 144 of 2025 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. 144 of 2025 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:20079-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 144 of 2025 Appellant :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Education Madhyamik U.P. Lko. And Others Respondent :- Deepak Pandey Counsel for Appellant :- C.S.C. Counsel for Respondent :- Rajesh Kumar Shukla Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J. 1. This intra-court appeal filed under Chapter VIII Rule V of Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 is delayed by 902 days. The application seeking condonation of delay is supported with an affidavit. 2. Except the ministerial exercise of the file moving from one table to another, no plausible explanation has been offered in the affidavit filed in support of the application for condonation of delay. No explanation of delay even after receiving the legal opinion in the month of January, 2023. 3. Explanation by the State for the inordinate delay in instituting the proceeding arising out of the judgement and order passed by the writ court is not a mere formality. Plausible justification is bound to be existing for making a prayer seeking condonation of delay on day to day basis. 4. The routine explanation as is the case at hand

SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. 144 of 2025 at Lucknow · Niyam