SOU. SUREKHA TANAJI NAIK vs SHRI. TANJAJI BALASO NAIK

Judgment text excerpt

2025:BHC-AS:18070 cra 311 of 2022.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.311 OF 2022 Surekha Tanaji Naik, Age 37 years, Occu – Household, R/o Rendal, Tal. Hatkangale, Dist. Kolhapur. … Applicant versus 1. Tajani Balaso Naik, Age 41 years, Occu – Agriculture, R/o Tendal, Tal. Hatkangale, Dist. Kolhapur. 2. Malutai Balaso Naik, Age 70 years, Occu – Agriculture, R/o as above. 3. Balaso Mahadeo Naik, Age 75 years, Occu – Agriculture. R/o as above. … Respondents Mr. Akshay Kulkarni, for Applicant. Mr. S.S.Jagtap, for Respondents. CORAM: N.J.JAMADAR, J. RESERVED ON : 29 JANUARY 2025 PRONOUNCED ON : 22 APRIL 2025 JUDGMENT : 1. This Revision is directed against an order dated 15 March 2022 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Sr. Division, Jaysingpur, on an application (Exh.10) for rejection of the Misc. Civil Application No.87 of 2021 (main application) under the provisions of Order VII Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil SSP 1/16 cra 311 of 2022.doc Procedure, 1908, on the premise that the main application was barred by law. 2. The background facts leading to the Revision Application can be summarized as under : 2.1 The marriage of the applicant was solemnized with Respondent No.1 on 10 June 2007. Respondent Nos.2 and 3 are the parents of Respondent No.1. 2.2 In the wake of the marital discord, the Respondents allegedly harassed and ill-treated the applicant. Respondent No.1 allegedly contracted marriage with another woman during the subsistence of the marital bond between the applicant and Respondent No.1. 2.3 The applicant approached the Protection Officer appointed under the provisions of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (DV Act, 2005). The Protection Officer forwarded the complaint to the Judi