Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-04-24

SHWETA DUTTA vs VEENA DUTTA & ORS.

Citation / case number
CS(OS)-217/2022 2025:DHC:2969
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
SHWETA DUTTA
Respondent
VEENA DUTTA & ORS.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 24.04.2025 CS(OS) 217/2022 SHWETA DUTTA .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Vanshul Pali, Advocate versus VEENA DUTTA & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Anand Mishra and Mr. Roshan, Advocates for D-1 to 3 % CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA JUDGMENT MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J (ORAL): I.A. 13683/2022 1. The present application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) has been filed by the defendant nos. 1 to 3 seeking rejection of the plaint on the ground that there is no cause of action for filing the present plaint. 2. The present suit has been filed by the plaintiff seeking partition of the estate of her deceased father, late Mr. Rajendra Kumar Dutta, who admittedly died intestate on 03.09.1995. 3. The plaintiff seeks partition of the property situated at B-23, Subhash Park, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi-110059 (‘suit property’) as per intestate succession against defendant no. 1 [mother of the plaintiff], defendant no. 2 [sister of the plaintiff], defendant no. 3 [brother of the plaintiff] and 4. Mr. Anand Mishra, learned counsel for the defendants’ states that the applicant/defendants h

SHWETA DUTTA vs VEENA DUTTA & ORS. · Niyam