SHRI GANGA RAM SHARMA vs SMT. SHASHI JAIN

Judgment text excerpt

$~68 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 24th April, 2025 + CM(M) 740/2025 & CM APPL. 24076-24077/2025 SHRI GANGA RAM SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dhan Mohan, Ms. Tanu B. Mishra, Ms. Tanisha Bhatia, Ms. Kawaljeet Kaur, Ms. Nikita Jha and Mr. Satyajeet Sharma, Advocates versus SMT. SHASHI JAIN .....Respondent Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) CM APPL. 24077/2025 (exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM(M) 740/2025 & CM APPL. 24076/2025 1. Petitioner has suffered a decree and the total decretal amount is stated to be Rs. 4,62,000/- as on 15.03.2025. Judgment debtor has, admittedly, made payment of Rs. 2,04,000/-. 2. The balance outstanding amount of Rs. 2,58,000/-. 3. The challenge in the present petition is, merely, with respect to the order dated 08.04.2025 whereby the learned Executing Court has directed issuance of arrest warrants. 4. Learned counsel for petitioner/judgment debtor submits that judgment debtor is ready to make payment of the balance decretal amount. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CM(M) 740/2025 1 By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:24.04.2025 19:13:57 5. Concerned judgment debtor is also present in person and during course of consideration, he, himself, stated before this Court that he would make balance payment of Rs. 2,58,000/- within two months from today. He also submits that if something extra is also due for the reason that aforesaid calculation was as on 15.03.2025, he would ensure that even such additional amount is also cleared within the aforesaid period of two months. He also submits that first such instalment would be made on or before 20.05.2025. 6. None appears on behalf of the decree holder despite advance notice. 7. In view of the abo