SHASHANK GARG vs STATE & ORS

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: 28th January, 2025 Pronounced on: 17th April, 2025 + CRL.M.C. 3583/2018 SHASHANK GARG 500, Sector 16, Faridabad Haryana .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nitin Mehta and Mr. Bhanu Sanoriya, Advocates. versus 1. STATE 437, Old Lawyers Chambers Block, High Court of Delhi New Delhi .....Respondent No.1 2. MAX SUPER SPECIALITY HOSPITAL Through Max India Ltd. East Block 2, Press Enclave Road, Saket New Delhi-110017 ...Respondent No.2 3. Mr. SAQIB, DUTY MANAGER Max Super Speciality Hospital East Block 2, Press Enclave Road, Saket New Delhi-110017 ...Respondent No.3 4. YOGESH SAREEN S/o Late Sh. Rakesh Pal Sareen R/o 83, Espace Nirvana Country, Sector-50, Gurgaon ....Respondent No.4 Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, Ld. APP for the State. Mr. Anil Bhasin, Advocate for R-2 and R-3. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CRL.M.C. 3583/2018 Page 1 of 14 By:VIKAS ARORA Signing Date:17.04.2025 18:02:30 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. 1. Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Cr.P.C.’), has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner, Mr. Shashank Garg, to challenge common Judgement and Order dated 19.05.2018 vide which the Criminal Revision Petitions bearing Criminal Revision bearing CR No. 8450/2016, CR No. 42/2017 and CR No. 79/2017, filed by the three Respondents separately against the Order of Summoning them under Sections 342/406/420/120B, were allowed and they were discharged in Complaint Case bearing CC No. 462884/2016. Brief Facts 2. Briefly stated, the Petitioner (Complainant), an Advocate by profession, was diagnosed with Cysticercosis and was recommended removal of the affected area in his right hand by the Consulting