SHARADAMBA COMPUTER CENTRE vs UNION OF INDIA

Judgment text excerpt

$~J * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on: 17.04.2025 + W.P.(C) 4290/2024 SHARADAMBA COMPUTER CENTRE .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Naushad Alam, Advocate (through VC) versus UNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Avshreya Pratap Singh Rudy, Senior Panel Counsel along with Ms. Usha Jamnal, Ms. Harshita Chaturvedi and Mr. Siddhant Nagar, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Tanuj Khurana, Mrs. Deepksha Khurana and Mr. Abhishek Rawat, Advocates for R-3. + W.P.(C) 4312/2024 M/S UNNATI FOUNDATION .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Naushad Alam, Advocate (through VC) versus UNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vikrant N. Goyal and Mr. Nitin, Advocates for UOI. Mr. Tanuj Khurana, Mrs. Deepksha Khurana and Mr. Abhishek Rawat, Advocates for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA JUDGMENT 1. At the very outset, it is noticed that the factual matrix in both petitions Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 4290/2024 & W.P.(C) 4312/2024 Page 1 of 7 By:ABHISHEK THAKUR Signing Date:21.04.2025 20:14:51 is substantially identical. While the petitions have been filed by two distinct petitioners, the nature of the reliefs sought remains the same, arising from similar circumstances and grievances. 2. In WP(C) 4290 of 2024 the petitioner, inter alia, prays as under – “(I) Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus or other suitable writ directing the Compliance Officer of the Respondent to submit the action taken by it on the grievances of the Petitioner in reference to his letter dated 03.02.2023 (ANNEXURE-P/10) and Petitioner's reply dated 21.02.2023 (ANNEXURE- P/11) -; (II) Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus or other suitable writ and or order or direction thereby commanding Respondent to release the Balance Payment of Rs. 1,26,23,645/-;” 3. In W.P.(C)-