SH RAJ KUMAR vs SH MANOJ KUMAR ETC & ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 7th April, 2025 CM(M) 640/2025 & CM APPL. 20263/2025 SH RAJ KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Sudershani, Advocate along with petitioner in person. versus SH MANOJ KUMAR ETC & ORS. .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of his suit, filed in the year 2016. 2. It is a settled position of law that the Constitutional Courts, unless there exists any exceptional reason, do not, generally, give any direction for expeditious disposal of any such matter. 3. The learned counsel for petitioner submits that the suit in question had earlier reached the stage of final arguments but later on, the defendant has been permitted to file amended written statement and, thereafter, there is no requisite progress in the matter. 4. The case is stated to be at the stage of plaintiff’s evidence after the additional issues had been framed on 16.12.2024 by the learned Trial Court. 5. Be that as it may, since no exceptional reason or hardship has been 6. However, it is always open to the petitioner to make appropriate request in this regard before the learned