SEEMA RANI vs UMESH KUMAR TREHAN

Judgment text excerpt

$~33 & 34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 1st April, 2025 + CM(M) 3799/2024 & CM APPL. 18882/2025 SEEMA RANI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Parinav Gupta, Advocate. versus UMESH KUMAR TREHAN .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anuj Arora, Advocate. 34 + CM(M) 3887/2024 & CM APPL. 18832/2025 NITIN ARORA AND ANR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Parinav Gupta, Advocate. versus UMESH KUMAR TREHAN .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anuj Arora, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) CM APPL. 18881/2025 (for modify the order dated 12.11.2024) in CM(M) 3799/2024 & CM APPL. 18667/2025 (for vacation of order dated 22.11.2024) & CM APPL. 18831/2025 (for modify the order dated 22.11.2024) in CM(M) 3887/2024 1. Since identical issue is involved in both the abovesaid petitions, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, these are being disposed of by this common order. 2. The matters have been taken up today on the basis of applications moved by respondents. 3. Respondent-Umesh Kumar Trehan had filed two separate suits for possession which were decreed in his favour. 4. Feeling aggrieved, the concerned tenants filed two appeals i.e. MCA DJ No. 22/2024 and MCA DJ No. 23/2024. Such appeals are pending adjudication before the concerned First Appellate Court. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CM(M) 3799/2024 & CM(M) 3887/2024 1 By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:02.04.2025 11:55:07 5. However, simultaneously, the respondent/decree-holder, based on such decree also filed execution petitions i.e. EX. No. 177/2024 and EX. No. 178/2024 and while considering the same, the learned Executing Court has issued warrants of possessions in both the matters. 6. The grievance of the petitioners/judgment-debtors/tenants herein is limited to the ef