SEEMA MALHOTRA vs RAKESH NAGPAL

Judgment text excerpt

$~69 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 08th April, 2025 + CM(M) 660/2025 & CM APPL. 20819-20820/2025 SEEMA MALHOTRA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Yash Gupta, Advocate Petitioner-in-person (Through VC) versus RAKESH NAGPAL .....Respondent Through: Ms. Indu Kaul, Advocate (Through VC) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) CM APPL. 20820/2025 (exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM(M) 660/2025 & CM APPL. 20819/2025 1. Issue raised in the present petition is very short and precise. 2. Petitioner has suffered a decree and pursuant to execution petition filed by the decree holder, the Court has issued warrants of possession with respect to the subject property bearing no. 1403, First Floor, Sector-D, Pocket-1, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi-110070. There is also direction to the Bailiff to break open the locks, if required, and concerned SHO has also been directed to render assistance. 3. Admittedly, judgment debtor has challenged the aforesaid decree and has already filed Regular First Appeal which has been registered as RFA No. 181/2025. It is also admitted case that no stay has been granted by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court while considering the aforesaid Regular Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CM(M) 660/2025 1 By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:09.04.2025 18:28:50 First Appeal. 4. The sole request coming from the side of judgment debtor is to the effect that on account of medical condition of her minor son and the fact that children of judgment debtor are to appear in examination, a period of two months may be granted to vacate the premises in question. It is submitted that on or before 09.06.2025, the keys of the aforesaid property shall be submitted before the learned Executing Court towards h