SATISH PRAKASH SINGH vs STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~82 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:1st April, 2025 + CRL.M.C. 1609/2025, CRL.M.A. 7296/2025 SATISH PRAKASH SINGH S/o SH. RAJENDAR SINGH RESIDENT OF H NO. VTC AKUBA, PO SATRAON, DISTRICT DEORIA, U.P.- 274604 .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sarthak Tomar, Advocate along with Petitioner in person versus 1. STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) THROUGH SHO P.S. SULTANPURI, DELHI ......Respondent No.1. 2. Ms. xxxxx W/o. SH. xxxxx RESIDENT OF xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx ......Respondent No.2. Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP for the State with SI Karamveer Dhall, PS Sultan Puri. Mr. Sarthak Dua, Advocate for R2 with R2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023(„BNSS‟ hereinafter) read with Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 („Cr.P.C‟ hereinafter) has been filed for Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VIKAS ARORA Signing Date:03.04.2025 CRL.M.C. 1609/2025 Page 1 of 3 18:14:49 quashing of FIR No.1084/2020 dated 19.09.2020 under Section 354(A)/509 IPC, P.S.Sultanpuri. 2. It is submitted that the Petitioner is a law abiding citizen. The Respondent No.2 is the niece of the Petitioner and they belong to the same family. The parties have now entered into a Memorandum of Settlement dated 10.09.2024 and thus, the prayer is made for quashing of FIR. 3. The Petition is supported with the affidavit of the Petitioner as well as Respondent No.2 who has given her “No Objection” to the quashing of the FIR. 4. The parties are present today in the Court and both the parties have endorsed the terms of the Settlement. The Respondent No.2 submits that she has no objection to the quashing of the FIR. 5. Submissions heard and record perused. 6. Respondent No.2 Complain