SANGITA SANDIP JADHAV POA SUNIL DINKAR PANASKAR AND ANR vs STATE OF MAHA. THR. SEC. AND ORS

Judgment text excerpt

Neeta Sawant WP-4681-2024-JR-FC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4681 OF 2024 1. Sangita Sandip Jadhav Age: 35 years, Occ: Housewife 2. Sandip Shivaji Jadhav Age: 43 years, Occ: Business R/at: Hajarmachi, Tal: Karad, District : Satara Both 1 and 2 above through their PoA Holder Sunil Dinkar Panaskar Age: 40 years, Occ: Stamp Vendor, R/at: Karad, District: Satara. ….Petitioners : Versus : 1. The State of Maharashtra Through its Secretary Department of Registration & Stamps, Mantralaya, Mumbai – 01. 2. Inspector General of Registration & Controller of Stamps, State of Maharashtra, Pune, Ground Floor, New Adm. Building, Pune – 411 001 [email protected] 3. The Office of Joint District Registrar (Class – I) and Stamp Collector, Taluka and District: Satara, Maharashtra. 4. The Office of the Sub Registrar, Class II, Karad 2, Karad, Satara. ….Respondents Mr. S. R. Nargolkar with Ms. Neeta Patil i/b Mr. Arjun Kadam, for the Petitioner. Mrs. M. S. Bane, AGP for the Respondents-State. __________________________________________________________________________ Page No.1 of 16 Wednesday, 2 April 2025 Neeta Sawant WP-4681-2024-JR-FC CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. Judgment Reserved On : 25 March 2025. Judgment Pronounced On : 2 April 2025. JUDGMENT: 1) Petitioners have filed this petition challenging the order dated 24 June 2021 passed by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, Maharashtra State, Pune rejecting Appeal No.133/2020 preferred by them challenging the order dated 23 September 2020 passed by the Collector of Stamps, Satara rejecting their application for refund of stamp duty. 2) Brief facts of the case are that Petitioners intended to purchase Flat Unit No. 7 admeasuring 975 sq. foot (built-up area) in building Rukmini