Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-04-01

S.C. BAJAJ vs STATE & ANR.

Citation / case number
CRL.L.P.-637/2019 2025:DHC:2178
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
S.C. BAJAJ
Respondent
STATE & ANR.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 01.04.2025 CRL.L.P. 637/2019 & CRL.M.A. 41142/2019, CRL.M.A. 5527/2021 S.C. BAJAJ ..... Petitioner versus STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents CRL.L.P. 638/2019 & CRL.M.A. 41161/2019 S.C. BAJAJ ..... Petitioner versus STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Applicant : Mr. Murari Tiwari, Ms. Nimisha Gupta, Mr. Pranshu Prakash and Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advs. For the Respondent : Mr.Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State Mr. Rajesh Banati, Mr. Ashish Sareen, Mr. Adil Asghar and Mr. Harsh Gupta, Advs. for R-2 CORAM HON’BLE MR JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN JUDGMENT CRL.L.P. 637/2019 & CRL.L.P. 638/2019 1. The present leaves to appeal are filed against the judgement dated 30.08.2019 (hereafter ‘impugned judgement’) passed by the learned 2. For the reasons discussed below, leaves to appeal are granted. CRL.A.________/2025 (to be numbered) and CRL.A.________/2025 (to be numbered) 3. The two complaints under Sections 138 and 142 of the NI Act were filed at the instance of the complainant/ appellant. It is averred that the accused/ Respondent No. 2 is known to the appellant for many years as both have their fac