RIZWAN AHMAD AND ORS. vs STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 21.04.2025 ,,,,,,,,,, + CRL.M.C. 10101/2024 RIZWAN AHMAD & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Wasim Ansari, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .…Respondents Through: Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa, APP with SI Sadhna, PS-Mangol Puri. Mr. Ansar Ahmad, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA JUDGMENT (ORAL) RAVINDER DUDEJA, J. 1. This is a petition under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quashing of FIR No. 1195/2023, dated 29.11.2023, registered at P.S Mangol Puri under sections 498/406/34 IPC and all proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of settlement between the parties. 2. The marriage between Petitioner No.1 and Respondent No.2 was solemnized on 02.04.2013 as per Muslim rites and ceremonies. One child namely Izaan Ahmad was born out of the said wedlock on 07.06.2014. It is submitted that due to temperamental differences, the couple started living separately from 11.07.2022. The Petitioner No.1 lodged FIR No. 1037/2023 under sections 379/406/494/420/34 IPC, CRL.M.C. 10101/2024 Page 1 of 4 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SUNITA KUMARI Signing Date:22.04.2025 10:45:40 registered at PS Civil Line, District Moradabad, UP. Thereafter, the Respondent No.2 filed a petition under section 12 of the DV Act and a complaint which culminated into the registration of FIR No. 1195/2023 against Petitioner No. 1 and his family members. 3. During the pendency of the proceedings, the parties were referred to mediation by the Court of Ld. JMFC, Mahila Court-01, Rohini Courts, Delhi where they amicably settled their disputes/claims before the Mediation Centre, Rohini Courts, Delhi vide Settlement/ Agreement dated 04.12.202