RISHI KUMAR GOEL & ANR. vs MAMTA RANI

Judgment text excerpt

$~66,67 and 74 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 28th April, 2025 + CM(M) 624/2025, CM APPL. 19781/2025 & CM APPL. 19782/2025 RISHI KUMAR GOEL & ANR. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shiv Charan Singh Garg with Mr. Imran Khan and Mr. Nikhil Gupta, Advocates. versus MAMTA RANI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Hemant Kumar Chaturvedi, Advocate. + CM(M) 627/2025, CM APPL. 19836/2025 & CM APPL. 19837/2025 RISHI KUMAR GOEL & ANR. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shiv Charan Singh Garg with Mr. Imran Khan and Mr. Nikhil Gupta, Advocates. versus AMIT GUPTA & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Hemant Kumar Chaturvedi, Advocate. + CM(M) 606/2025 & CM APPL. 19153/2025 RISHI KUMAR GOEL & ANR. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shiv Charan Singh Garg with Mr. Imran Khan and Mr. Nikhil Gupta, Advocates. versus SMT URMILA GUPTA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Hemant Kumar Chaturvedi, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. With the consent of learned counsel for parties, all the three petitions Signature Not Verified CM(M) 624/2025& other connected matters 1 Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:30.04.2025 12:02:32 have been taken up together. Moreover, the issue raised in all the three petitions is identical in nature and all the abovesaid three suits are being defended by common defendant i.e. Mr. Rishi Kumar Goel. 2. There are three separate commercial suits which have been filed against the petitioners herein. 3. All such cases are at the stage of defendant’s evidence. 4. During the pendency of the suits, separate applications were moved under Order VII Rule 10 read with Order VII Rule 11 CPC praying therein that the suits be dismissed as these was not involving any commercial dispute. 5. The grievance in the present petition is