RAJNI vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 01st April, 2025 W.P.(C) 4043/2025 RAJNI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Baniwal and Ms. Manisha, Advocates. versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Advocate for MCD. Ms. Manisha Agarwal Narain, CGSC with Mr. Nipun Jain, Advocate for R- 2 & 3. Mr. Abhinav Garg, Panel Counsel with Ms. Palak Gupta, Advocates for R-4. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral) 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner- Rajni under Article 226 of the Constitution of India inter alia seeking re-establishment of the vending unit of the Petitioner, demolished illegally by the Respondent on 30th July 2024. 3. The Petitioner is vending her wares at Sheetla Mata Market, Madangir (South Zone, Ward – S - 79). The case of the Petitioner is that he has been 4. According to the Petitioner, the demolition of his vending unit was contrary to law as the said demolition was without any intimation. Ld. 5. One of the contentions of the Petitioner is that she has been paying property tax for the si