Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-04-30

RAJESH vs SUNIL GANGWAL

Citation / case number
CM(M)-4121/2024 2025:DHC:3182
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
RAJESH
Respondent
SUNIL GANGWAL
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 30th April, 2025 CM(M) 4121/2024 RAJESH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anubhav Dadhich, Advocate. versus SUNIL GANGWAL .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) CM APPL. 25691/2025 (seeking early hearing) 1. Petitioner seeks early hearing and disposal of the petition in question. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that in view of the fact that there is clear-cut admission made by the defendant, it is a fit case where the learned Trial Court should have allowed his application moved under order XII Rule 6 CPC. 3. In view of the request made by the learned counsel for petitioner, the matter is taken up today itself. 4. Application stands disposed of accordingly. CM(M) 4121/2024 5. Petitioner had filed a suit seeking recovery of Rs.6.90 lacs against the defendant. The suit was earlier filed under Order XXXVII CPC but on the request of the plaintiff himself, the suit was converted into an ordinary one. 6. Admittedly, the written statement has already been filed by the 7. Right here, this Court would clarify that the power vested with any such Court under Order XII Rule 6 CPC