RAHUL DASS vs ANAMIKA RASTOGI

Judgment text excerpt

$~90 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 21.04.2025 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 147/2025 RAHUL DASS .....Appellant Through: Dr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Adv. versus ANAMIKA RASTOGI .....Respondent Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGAR NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL) CM APPL. 22770/2025 (Exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM APPL. 22771/2025 2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the delay of 15 days in filing the appeal is condoned. 3. The application stands disposed of. CM APPL. 22772/2025 4. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the delay of 10 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned. 5. The application stands disposed of. MAT.APP.(F.C.) 147/2025 6. This appeal has been filed by the appellant, challenging the Order dated 17.01.2025 passed by the learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, South West District, Dwarka Court, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as, ‘Family Court’) in HMA Petition No. 752/2024, titled Rahul Dass v. Anamika Rastogi, returning the Signature Not Verified Signed By:VIJAYA MAT.APP.(F.C.) 147/2025 Page 1 of 4 LAKSHMI DOBHAL Signing Date:25.04.2025 17:08:57 divorce petition filed by the appellant herein under Order VII Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as, ‘CPC’) with liberty to file the same before a Court having territorial jurisdiction. 7. It is the case of the appellant himself, that the marriage between the appellant and the respondent was solemnised on 22.10.2018 at Dehradun, Uttarakhand. It is further the case of the appellant that after the marriage, the parties started to reside at Janakpuri, Delhi before they left for Australia. They were also blessed with a child in