PRAVINAST PANDEY vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 04.02.2025 Pronounced on: 25.04.2025 + W.P.(C) 14182/2021 PRAVINAST PANDEY .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Bhanu Gupta, Adv versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Raj Kumar Yadav, SPC with Mr.Vaibhav Bhardwaj & Ms.Tripti Sinha, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR JUDGMENT NAVIN CHAWLA, J. 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner, praying for the following reliefs: “(i) Issue a writ of certiorari for quashing of order dated 22.07.2021 to the extent whereby the respondents have not taken into consideration the remaining adverse noting of the initiating officer and has not taken into consideration the past performance of the petitioner in accessing him/improving upon the overall grade in APAR for the period 13.08.2019 to 31.03.2020 and thereby partially allowed the representation dated 02.03.2021 and for quashing of letter dated 13.12.2019 whereby the respondents have issued advice to the Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 14182/2021 Page 1 of 20 By:RENUKA NEGI Signing Date:25.04.2025 20:01:39 petitioner and for quashing of letter dated 17.02.2020 whereby the second advice was issued to the petitioner for submitting his representation against the first advice and for quashing of letter dated 06.03.2020 whereby the third advice was issued to the petitioner within a period of three months and for quashing of APAR of the petitioner for the period 13.08.2019 to 31.03.2020 to extent where initiating officer has mentioned the advices issued by him has been noted in the APAR and for quashing of advice dated 06.08.2020 issued by IG, BSF and for quashing of order dated 18.03.2021 whereby DG’s displeasure was issued to the petitioner; AND (i