Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-04-23

PRATIGYA SHARMA vs AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-17783/2024 2025:DHC:2951
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
PRATIGYA SHARMA
Respondent
AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on 23.04.2025 W.P.(C) 17783/2024 PRATIGYA SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Alok Raj and Mr. Baliram Kumar Thakur, Advocates. versus AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Digvijay Rai, Mr. Archit Mishra, Advocates with Mr. Yatinder Singh, Law Officer for AAI. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN PRATEEK JALAN, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, challenging the cancellation of her candidature for appointment as a Junior Executive (Air Traffic Control) in the respondent - Airports Authority of India [“AAI”] in the Other Backward Classes-Non Creamy Layer [“OBC-NCL”] category. A. Facts: 2. By way of advertisement No. 05/2023 issued on 14.10.2023, AAI invited applications for 496 vacancies in the post of Junior Executive (Air Traffic Control). 140 vacancies were reserved for OBC-NCL category. The instructions, which were part of the recruitment notification, included the following provision with regard to the OBC Category: “7. IMPORTANT INSTRUCTIONS: xxx xxx xxx 3. As is commonly found in such advertisements, it also contained specific instructions that ca