PRAMOD R. MALPANI vs SHAM T. PARDESHI AND OTHER

08-CRA-267-2010.doc ARJUN VITTHAL Arjun KUDHEKAR 2. Sanjay Tuljaram Pardeshi _______________________________________________________________ Mr. Surel S. Shah, Senior Advocate i/b Mr. Nachiket V. Khaladkar, for the Applicant. Mr. S. S. Patwardhan i/b Ms. Mrinal A. Shelar, for Respondent No.1A. _______________________________________________________________ CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED: 15 APRIL 2025 JUDGMENT: 1. Heard Mr. Surel S. Shah, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Applicant and Mr. S. S. Patwardhan, learned Counsel appearing for the Respondents. Challenge: 2. By the present Civil Revision Application the challenge is to the legality and validity of the Order dated 8th December 2009 passed by the learned District Judge, Pune in Regular Civil Appeal No.474 of 2009 (“impugned Order”). By the impugned Order the Appeal filed by the present Respondent No.1 has been allowed by setting aside Order dated 3rd August 2009 passed by the learned Additional Judge, Small Causes 1 08-CRA-267-2010.doc Court and Jt. C.J.S.D., Pune below Exhibit-39 in Regular Darkhast No.152 of 2004. The relief sought in the said Application bearing Exhibit-39 filed in said Regular Darkhast by the R