PAWAN SINGH vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 15.04.2025 W.P.(CRL) 4072/2024 PAWAN SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC for State with SI Anuradha, PS Harsh Vihar CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 11266/2025 (exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.A. 11265/2025 (for early hearing) 2. Keeping in mind that for past 2-3 dates the matter could not reach for hearing till end of the day before the predecessor bench, the application is allowed with consent of both sides and hearing dated 22.05.2025 is preponed to this day. W.P.(CRL) 4072/2024 3. The petitioner has assailed order dated 30.10.2024 of the competent W.P.(CRL) 4072/2024 pages 2025. 4. It is contended on behalf of petitioner that in view of order dated 07.06.2019 passed by the Additional Inspector General of Prisons, Tihar, the punishment of warning is not a substantive punishment, so cannot be treated as a reason to deny furlough. 5. Apart from the above mentioned order, copy whereof has been placed on record at pdf 21, it also would be significant to note tha