PARVEEN KUMAR vs DELHI CANTONMENT BOARD & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 21st April, 2025 + W.P.(C) 8347/2021 & CM APPL. 25858/2021, CM APPL. 42400/2021, CM APPL. 12139/2022, CM APPL. 18216/2022, CM APPL. 35857/2022, CM APPL. 43928/2022, CM APPL. 61979/2024 PARVEEN KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person M: 9868013891 versus DELHI CANTONMENT BOARD & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, SC, GNCTD with Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Mr. Ankur Mishra, Mr. Tarveen SinghNanda, Ms. Laavanya Kaushik and Ms. Aliza Alam, Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat and Mr. Amitoj Chadha, Advs. for R-1 M: 8851273736 Email: [email protected] Mr. Rakesh Kumar, CGSC with Mr. Tanveer Singh Nand, GP and Mr. Sunil, Adv. for UOI M: 9811549455 Email: [email protected] CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA MINI PUSHKARNA, J (ORAL) 1. Present writ petition has been filed seeking quashing of the order dated 05th April, 2021, vide which, the building plan of the petitioner was rejected. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 8347/2021 Page 1 of 10 By:AMAN UNIYAL Signing Date:23.04.2025 10:06:21 2. During the pendency of the present petition, vide order dated 21st December, 2021, this Court had directed the petitioner to make a representation to the respondent no.1. The respondent no.1, i.e., Delhi Cantonment Board was directed to give an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner and decide the representation. 3. The order dated 21st December, 2021 passed by this Court, reads as under: “xxx xxx xxx 1. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent - Delhi Cantonment Board submits that the representation of the petitioner with regard to mutation as well as determining the proportionate house tax is under active consideration of the competent authority. 2. Perusal of