OM GULATI vs RAJIV GULATI HUF AND OTHERS

Judgment text excerpt

$~65 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 30.04.2025 + FAO(OS) 51/2025 OM GULATI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Mandeep Singh Vinaik, Ms Anjali Sharma, Mr S.K Sagar, Ms Ragini Vinaik and Ms. Gaikhuanlung, Advs. versus RAJIV GULATI HUF AND OTHERS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neha Kapoor and Mr. Kaushal Mehta, Advs. for R-1 and 2. Mr. Arunav Pattnaik, Ms. Bhabhna Das, Ms. Jagriti Pandey and Ms. Anju Rani, Advs. for R-3 and 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGAR NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL) CM APPL. 25862/2025 (Exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CAV 158/2025 2. As Ms. Bhabhna Das, Advocate, has entered appearance on behalf of the respondent no. 3/caveator, the caveat stands discharged. FAO(OS) 51/2025 AND CM APPL. 25861/2025 3. This appeal has been filed the appellant, challenging the Order dated 02.04.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in Signature Not Verified Signed By:VIJAYA FAO(OS) 51/2025 Page 1 of 6 LAKSHMI DOBHAL Signing Date:07.05.2025 11:34:33 I.A. No. 5286/2025 in CS (OS) 133/2025, titled Om Gulati v. Rajiv Gulati HUF & Ors., vacating the ad-interim order of injunction dated 28.02.2025. 4. The appellant has filed the above Suit inter alia alleging that the respondent no. 1 is the Hindu Undivided Family (hereinafter referred to as, ‘HUF’), constituted by the respondent no. 2 as its Karta, and the appellant, the respondent no. 3, and the respondent no. 4 are the coparceners thereof. In the plaint, it is alleged that the property bearing No. 13 Khan Market, New Delhi was originally residential in nature and has recently been converted into a commercial premises, in or around the year 2019. Further, it is stated that there is another commercial property, bearing No. 8-A Kha