NICE (SOCIETY) TRUST vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~70 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 22.04.2025 + CRL.M.C. 2650/2025 & CRL.M.A. 11913/2025 NICE (SOCIETY) TRUST .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajeet Shukla and Ms. Noor Alam, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State with Inspector Amit Pratap, PS EOW CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Petitioner has filed this petition seeking cancellation of bail granted to the respondent no.2 vide Order dated 18.05.2022 of the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. Having heard learned counsel for petitioner at length, I do not find it a fit case to even issue notice. 2. Broadly speaking, the ground on which cancellation of bail is sought by petitioner is that respondent no.2 left NCT of Delhi without informing the SHO concerned and did not drop a pin location on Google Maps so that his location could be available to the Investigating Officer. Crl. M.C. 2650/2025 Page 1 of 3 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH GIRISH KATHPALIA KATHPALIA Date: 2025.04.22 18:33:58 -07'00' Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:22.04.2025 19:01:07 3. Learned counsel for petitioner has taken me through the Bail Order dated 18.05.2022 (Annexure-B) and it is contended by him that for violation of the above mentioned conditions, bail granted to respondent no.2 is liable to be cancelled. Learned counsel for petitioner has also taken me through paragraphs 6 and 13 of the Bail Order and it is submitted by him that once the Co-ordinate Bench took a view that there were issues which required trial, there is no need for Trial Court to hear arguments on charge, but that is being done and the trial is being delayed. No other ground for cancellation of bail has been raised. 4. Learne