Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-04-07

MRS. KIRAN SURAN vs SH. SATISH KUMAR & ORS.

Citation / case number
FAO (COMM)-27/2025 2025:DHC:2365-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
MRS. KIRAN SURAN
Respondent
SH. SATISH KUMAR & ORS.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 23.01.2025 Pronounced on: 07.04.2025 + FAO (COMM) 27/2025 & CM APPL. 4381/2025 MRS. KIRAN SURAN .....Appellant Through: Mr.Shailendra Dahiya, Adv. versus SH. SATISH KUMAR & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr.Sanjay Katyal and Ms.Ritika Bansal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA JUDGMENT NAVIN CHAWLA, J. 1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 read with Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short, ‘A&C Act’), challenging the Order dated 18.10.2024 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Impugned Order’) passed by the District Judge (Commercial Court- 01) East District Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘learned Trial Court’) in OMP (COMM) No. 11/2022, titled Kiran Suran v. Satish Kumar & Ors. (hereinafter referred to as ‘Section 34 Petition’), whereby, the learned Trial Court has dismissed the application filed by the appellant herein under Section 34(3) of the A&C Act seeking condonation of delay of 287 days in filing the said Section 34 Petition. 2. The appellant, on or around 18.04.2022, h