MR. HARJEET SINGH & ANR. vs ANSAL PLAZA OWNERS WELFARE ASSOCIATION (THROUGH ITS SECRETARY) & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 24th April, 2025 + FAO 108/2025 & CM APPL. 24033/2025 MR. HARJEET SINGH & ANR. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar & Mr. Ashish Dholakia, Sr. Advs. with Mr. Ankur Chawla, Mr. Akshay Ringe, Mr. Anuj Malhotra, Ms. Prerna Mahajan, Ms. Ishanee Kapoor, Ms. Janhavi Negi & Ms. Meghna Jandu, Advs. versus ANSAL PLAZA OWNERS WELFARE ASSOCIATION (THROUGH ITS SECRETARY) & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Raghav Sabharwal, Mr. Harsh Vardhan Singh & Mr. Ayush Shrivastava, Advs. for R1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA DHARMESH SHARMA, J. (ORAL) CM APPL. 24034/2025 – EXMP. 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. Application is disposed of. FAO 108/2025 & CM APPL. 24033/2025 3. The appellants have preferred the present appeal under Order XLIII Rule 1(r) read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [“CPC”], thereby assailing the impugned order dated 17.04.2025 passed by learned District Judge-06, South-East, Saket Signature Not Verified FAO 108/2025 Digitally Signed By:PRAMOD Page 1 of 5 KUMAR VATS Signing Date:24.04.2025 18:38:24 Courts, Delhi [“Trial Court”], in a pending suit, instituted at the behest of the respondent No.1/plaintiff-Association. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent No.1/plaintiff-Association is present on advance notice. 5. In a nutshell, the respondent No.1/plaintiff-Association has instituted a suit challenging the election of the new Executive Committee purportedly representing the members of the Ansal Plaza Mall, New Delhi, and has sought the following interim reliefs in its application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the CPC: “1. Restraining defendants from declaring any election results concerning APOWA until further orders of this Court. 2. Restraining