Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-04-09

MOHAMMED SAMJAD AND ORS vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS.

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-4544/2025 2025:DHC:2539-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
MOHAMMED SAMJAD AND ORS
Respondent
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~56 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision 9th April, 2025 + W.P.(C) 4544/2025 & CM APPL. 21028/2025 MOHAMMED SAMJAD AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Shiyas K.R., Advocate. versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neha Rastogi along with Mr. Animesh Rastogi, Advocates for R-2. Ms. Palak Gupta, Advocate for R-3. (through VC). Ms. Beenashaw Soni for MCD. SI Manisha, PS Hauz Khas. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. CM APPL. 21027/2025 (for exemption) 2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 4544/2025 & CM APPL. 21028/2025 3. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the following eleven Petitioners- (i) Mohammad Samjad, Aged 44, S/o Akimuddin, Signature Not Verified Signed By:NAMITA W.P.(C) 4544/2025 Page 1 of 5 DHYANI Signing Date:11.04.2025 16:20:27 (ii) Leela Devi, Aged 64, D/o Sita Ram, (iii) Balbir Singh, Aged 70, S/o Kishan Devi, (iv) Mokhtar Ahamad, Aged 31, S/o Md. Iwanul, (v) Shivam Gupta, Aged 25, S/o Ramarcha Gupta, (vi) Shabbir Ahmad Aged 32, S/o Md. Aqueenmuddin Paroo Majhaulity Bichla Tola, (vii) Shiv Kumar Chaudhary, Aged 52, S/o Laxman Chaudhary, (viii) Md Rizwan Siddqui, Aged 122, S/o Amjad Siddqui, (ix) Shankar Shah, Aged 26, S/o Ram Archa, (x) Md Imran Siddiqui, Aged 25 S/o Md Amjad Siddqui & (xi) Rani Musrat, Aged 19, D/o Moh Samjad seeking the following reliefs: a. Direct Respondent Nos I and 2 to allow the Petitioners to continue street vending at the premises of South Zone, Ward S 62, Yusuf Sarai, New Delhi, without any hindrance. b. Direct Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to abstain from any adverse action that re

MOHAMMED SAMJAD AND ORS vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS. · Niyam