MAYANK PANDEY vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 03.04.2025 + BAIL APPLN. 4458/2024 MAYANK PANDEY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Murari Tiwari, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore, APP with SI Sandeep Singh, PS Ghazipur CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. In furtherance of last order, I have heard learned counsel for accused/applicant as well as learned prosecutor. 2. The accused/applicant seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 302/2024 of PS Ghazipur for offence under Section 420/468/471 IPC. 3. Learned counsel for accused/applicant submits that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that a purely civil dispute has been given colour of criminality only to fix the accused/applicant. Further, learned counsel for accused/applicant submits that ever since first date of hearing of this matter, the accused/applicant has BAIL APPLN. 4458/2024 pages 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, postalCode=110003, st=DELHI, serialNumber=D3E86796451EC45C07B5D15570996B40F80CBD2EEE60402C487965FF801E 26FA, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2025.04.03 17:5