MAYANK AHUJA vs THE COMMISSIONER DELHI POLICE & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~87 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 17.04.2025 + W.P.(CRL) 1230/2025 & CRL.M.A. 11651/2025 MAYANK AHUJA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sachin Puri, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Mukesh Gupta and Mr. Kunal Malhotra, Advocate and complainant de facto versus THE COMMISSIONER DELHI POLICE & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anand V. Khatri, ASC for the State/GNCTD CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks following reliefs in this writ petition: “(a) Direct the respondents to add relevant provisions of law in the present FIR No. 227/2025 dated 12.04.2025 U/S 308 IPC now called as 110 BNS of 2023 and other provisions us applicable to the present case /FIR against the above said persons; (b) Direct the respondents to preserve the CCTV footage of the alleged incident; (c) Direct the respondents to provide police protect to the petitioner and his family members since the petitioner has apprehension of life threat against the above said persons; (d) Pass any other or further order(s), as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the present facts and circumstances of case.” W.P.(CRL) 1230/2025 Page 1 of 3 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH GIRISH KATHPALIA KATHPALIA Date: 2025.04.17 17:37:04 -07'00' Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:17.04.2025 18:47:02 2. So far as prayer (a) is concerned, learned ASC after discussing with the Investigating Officer/SI Abhay submits that they are already in the process of obtaining fresh medical opinion from RML Hospital where the complainant de facto went for second examination. Depending upon the outcome of the said opinion, the police shall decide about the offence to be added or not to be added in the FIR. Learned Senior Counsel for petitione