Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-04-21

MARRY MESSY vs NAVEEN BEHAL

Citation / case number
CM(M)-681/2025 2025:DHC:2828
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
MARRY MESSY
Respondent
NAVEEN BEHAL
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 21st April, 2025 CM(M) 681/2025 & CM APPL. 21572/2025 MARRY MESSY .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Shasha Jain with Mr. Tarun Lai, Advocates. versus NAVEEN BEHAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Jitin Tewatia, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioner is defending a suit for recovery of possession, arrears of rent and mesne profits. 2. Plaintiff-Mr. Naveen Behal entered into witness box and closed his evidence. When the case was at the stage of evidence of the defendant, instead of leading evidence, certain applications were moved by the defendant. 3. According to petitioner/defendant, she did not submit evidence-affidavits immediately as she was, somehow, under the impression that a direction to that effect would come only after her applications were disposed of. It is submitted that defendant never had any intention to prolong 4. This Court has gone through the order dated 07.12.2024 whereby the applications moved by the defendants were dismissed and simultaneously, her right to lead evidence was closed. 5. The subsequent orders dated 03.12.2025 and 22.03.2025 have also been seen. 6. Duri