MANISHA DHAWAN vs MOHAMMAD ALI

Judgment text excerpt

$~56 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 04.04.2025 + C.R.P. 100/2025 & CM APPL. 20080-20082/2025 MANISHA DHAWAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anurag Bindal, Mr. Vaibhav Gupta & Mr. Mohd. Uwaiz, Advocates. versus MOHAMMAD ALI .....Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) CM APPL. 20081/2025 [Seeking condonation of delay in re-filing] 1. This is an Application filed on behalf of the Petitioner seeking condonation of delay of 16 days in re-filing the present Petition. 2. For the reasons as stated in the Application, the delay is condoned. 3. The Application stands disposed of. CM APPL. 20080/2025 [Seeking condonation of delay in filing] 4. This is an Application filed on behalf of the Petitioner seeking condonation of delay of 8 days in filing the present Petition. 5. For the reasons as stated in the Application, the delay is condoned. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:JAI NARAYAN Signing Date:25.04.2025 C.R.P. 100/2025 Page 1 of 7 20:01:38 6. The Application stands disposed of. CM APPL. 20083/2025 [Exemption] 7. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. 8. The Application stands disposed of. C.R.P. 100/2025 9. The present Petition has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [hereinafter referred to as “CPC”] against the order dated 05.11.2024 passed by learned District Judge- 08, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “Impugned Order”]. By the Impugned Order, the Application under Order XII Rule 6 of the CPC has been dismissed by the learned Trial Court. 10. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner has filed a suit for possession, injunction, recovery of arrears of rent and mesne pro