Delhi High Court · 2025-04-23
MAHADEV INDUSTRIES (THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR PARVEEN GARG) vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
- Citation / case number
- W.P.(C)-3887/2025 2025:DHC:3031-DB
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Petitioner
- MAHADEV INDUSTRIES (THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR PARVEEN GARG)
- Respondent
- UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Judgment text excerpt
$~136 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 23rd April, 2025 + W.P.(C) 3887/2025 & CM APPL. 18071/2025 MAHADEV INDUSTRIES (THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR PARVEEN GARG) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nitin Gulati, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Piyush Beriwal, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral) 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner– Mahadev Industries challenging the show cause notice dated 1st December, 2023 (hereinafter, ‘the SCN’) issued by the Department of Trade & Taxes upon the Petitioner concern pertaining to the tax period April, 2018 to March, 2019. The petition also challenges the consequent order dated 27th April, 2024 (hereinafter, ‘the impugned order’) passed under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter, ‘CGST Act, 2017’) 3. Additionally, the present petition also challenges the Notification No. 56/2023- Central Tax dated 28th December, 2023 issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (hereinafter, ‘the impugned notification’). 4. The present petition is a part of a batch of petitions wherein inter alia, the impugned notification has been challenged. The W.P.(C) No. 16499/2023 W.P.(C) 3887/2025 Page 1 of 8 Signature Not Verified Signed By:NAMITA DHYANI Signing Date:30.04.2025 19:10:57 titled DJST Traders Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors. is the lead matter in the said batch of petitions. On the last date of hearing i.e., 22rd April, 2025, the parties were heard at length qua the validity of the impugned notifications and accordingly, the following order was passed: “4. Submissions have been heard in part. The broad cha