M/S THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD vs SUKHPAL KAUR & ORS

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 03 April 2025 Judgment pronounced on: 24 April 2025 + MAC. APP. 492/2016 M/S THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Navdeep Singh & Mr. Subhash Singh, Advs. versus SMT. SUKHPAL KAUR & ORS. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Dewan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Anish Dewan, Mr. Yash Yadav, Ms. Garima Verma, Mr. Aayush D, Ms. Shruti Jain, Ms. Kashish Jain, Mr. Chitranshi and Ms. Yangtsapila Sangtam, Advs. For R1 to R4. Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Baliyan and Mr. Nirbhay Sharma, Advs. For R-6. Mr. Yuvraj Sharma & Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advs. For R-9. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA JUDGEMENT REVIEW PET. 122/2024 & CM. APPL. 9536/2025 in MAC. APP. 492/2016 1. The present review petition has been preferred by respondents No. 1 to 4/claimants, being the wife and children of the deceased, Late Sh. Iqbal Singh Dosanjh, seeking review of the judgment dated 29.02.2024 passed by this Court vide which the appeal preferred by Signature Not Verified MAC. APP. 492/2016 Digitally Signed By:PRAMOD Page 1 of 9 KUMAR VATS Signing Date:24.04.2025 16:29:54 the appellant/Insurance Company against the judgment-cum-award dated 21.03.2016, passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi 1, was partly allowed, thereby reducing the compensation amount from Rs. 2,23,34,350/- to Rs. 49,29,860/-, which was directed to be paid to the widow of the deceased along with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of filing of the petition, i.e., 07.04.2010, till the date of realisation. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent Nos 1 to 4/claimants submitted that the impugned judgment has been assailed on the ground that this Court did not consider that the Income Tax Retur