M/ S SAI WORLD vs M / S R. G. BIO COSMETIC PVT. LTD

Judgment text excerpt

$~88 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 22.04.2025 + C.R.P. 236/2023 & CM APPL. 44308/2023 M/ S SAI WORLD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Debjani D. Purkayastha, Advocate. versus M / S R. G. BIO COSMETIC PVT. LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sreejan Pankaj & Ms. Ritu, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) 1. The present Petition seeks to challenge an interlocutory order dated 14.07.2023 passed by learned District Judge, Comm-03/SEC/Saket, Delhi in CS(Comm) 449/2019 captioned M/s R.G. Bio Cosmetics Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s Sai World. 2. Learned Counsel for the Respondent draws the attention of the Court to Section 8 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 [hereinafter referred to as the “CC Act”]to submit that the present Petition is barred by the provisions of Section 8 of the CC Act. 3. This Court agrees. Section 8 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 [hereinafter referred to as the “CC Act”] sets out that no civil revision petition shall be entertained against any interlocutory order. It is apposite to set out Section 8 of the CC Act below: Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:JAI NARAYAN Signing Date:26.04.2025 C.R.P. 236/2023 Page 1 of 3 13:41:21 “8. Bar against revision application or petition against an interlocutory order.—Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, no civil revision application or petition shall be entertained against any interlocutory order of a Commercial Court, including an order on the issue of jurisdiction, and any such challenge, subject to the provisions of section 13, shall be raised only in an appeal against the decree of the Commercial Court.” 4. The Division Bench of this Court in the case of Black Diamond Track Parts (P) Ltd. v. Black