LATIKA SARJERAO BHOSALE vs THE ADDI. COLLECTOR PUNE DISTIRCT PUNE AND ORS

Judgment text excerpt

sns 43-aswp-7651-2022-J.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7651 OF 2022 Latika Sarejrao Bhosale ] Age: 48 years, Occu.: Business, ] R/o: Chaitanya Niwas, Bhaveshwari ] Society, More Vasti, Chikhli, ] Pune. ] ...Petitioner. V/s 1. The Additional Collector, ] Pune District, Pune. ] 2. District Mining Officer, ] Pune. ] 3. The Tahasildar, Daund, ] Tal. Daund, Dist. Pune. ] 4. Gram Panchayat, Kauthadi, ] Tal. Daund, Dist. Pune. ] 5. The State of Maharashtra ] Mantralaya, ] Mumbai-400 032. ] ...Respondents. Mr. Nitin P. Deshpande for Petitioner. Mr. A.A. Alaspurkar, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 & 5-State. Mr. Laxman Deshmukh i/by Adv. Rupesh Zade for Respondent No.4. CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND KAMAL KHATA, JJ. RESERVED ON : 1st April, 2025. PRONOUNCED ON : 8th April, 2025. Digitally signed by SUMEDH SUMEDH NAMDEO NAMDEO SONAWANE SONAWANE Date: 1/7 2025.04.08 14:41:28 +0530 sns 43-aswp-7651-2022-J.doc JUDGMENT (Per Kamal Khata, J.):- 1) By this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the Petitioner seeks the following reliefs. “A. this Hon’ble Court may, by an appropriate writ, order or direction, quash and set aside the Resolution dated 28.07.2021 passed by the Gram Panchayat Kauthadi, Tal. Daund Dist. Pune (Exh.C) and direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to avail of the extraction of minor minerals. B. this Hon’ble Court may, by an appropriate writ, order or direction, direct the respondent No.1 to grant extension of the period of mining lease for further period that is lost due to the obstruction of Respondent No.4 Gram Panchayat. (bb) that this Hon’ble Court may by way of appropriate writ, order or direction quash and set aside the Gram Sabha Resolution dated 2nd December 2021 and permi