LATIKA SARJERAO BHOSALE vs THE ADDI. COLLECTOR PUNE DISTIRCT PUNE AND ORS

sns 43-aswp-7651-2022-J.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7651 OF 2022 Latika Sarejrao Bhosale ] Age: 48 years, Occu.: Business, ] R/o: Chaitanya Niwas, Bhaveshwari ] Society, More Vasti, Chikhli, ] Pune. ] ...Petitioner. V/s 1. The Additional Collector, ] Pune District, Pune. ] 2. District Mining Officer, ] Pune. ] 3. The Tahasildar, Daund, ] Tal. Daund, Dist. Pune. ] 4. Gram Panchayat, Kauthadi, ] Tal. Daund, Dist. Pune. ] 5. The State of Maharashtra ] Mantralaya, ] Mumbai-400 032. ] ...Respondents. Mr. Nitin P. Deshpande for Petitioner. Mr. A.A. Alaspurkar, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 & 5-State. Mr. Laxman Deshmukh i/by Adv. Rupesh Zade for Respondent No.4. CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND KAMAL KHATA, JJ. RESERVED ON : 1st April, 2025. PRONOUNCED ON : 8th April, 2025. 2021. On 30th June, 2021 the Additional Collector sanctioned the mining lease for a period of five years i.e. upto 29th June, 2026. 3) The Petitioner contends that, when she was ready for carrying out her activities, the Grampanchayat obstructed her activity on the basis of a Resolution by the Gram Sabha against the mining operations. In these circumstances,