Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-04-23

KULDEEP vs CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (CBI)

Citation / case number
BAIL APPLN.-3886/2024 2025:DHC:2837
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
KULDEEP
Respondent
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (CBI)
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 23.04.2025 + BAIL APPLN. 3886/2024 & CRL.M.A. 32117/2024 (stay) KULDEEP .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anjani Kumar Rai, Advocate versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (CBI) .....Respondent Through: Ms. Anubha Bhardwaj, SPP, CBI with Ms. Mehak Arora, Advocate with Pratik Kumar, PI, CBI CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks anticipatory bail in a case for offence under Section 61(2) of BNS and Sections 7, 7A, 8 and 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act. 2. Broadly speaking, according to prosecution, on the basis of an information, CBI carried out a raid in the premises of Inland Container Depot, Tughlakabad in which two public servants and three non-public servants were arrested on the spot. It is further alleged that the accused/applicant, who is a non-public servant, fled the spot. The role ascribed to the accused/applicant is that he was working as a tout for BAIL APPLN. 3886/2024 pages 3. Learned counsel for accused/applicant submits that no specific role has been assigned to the accused/applicant in the RC registered by CBI. It is also contended by learned counsel that the