KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LTD vs RINKI DUTT & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~O-2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 2083/2024 Date of Decision: 01.04.2025 IN THE MATTER OF: KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shankar Sen and Mr. Kush Gupta, Advs. versus RINKI DUTT & ANR. .....Respondents Through: None. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV JUDGEMENT PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J. (ORAL) 1. The service affidavit has been placed on record which reads as under:- “AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE I, RAJESH JANGRA ADVOCATE, ERONL: (D-1457A/2003), OFFICE AT: ED-15C & D, PITAMPURA, DELHI – DO HEREBY SOLEMNLY AFFIRM AND DECLARE AS UNDER:- LIST MATTER ON 18.12.2024 1. That I am the counsel for the plaintiff in the present Petition and that my registered Email ID is; [email protected] 2. That the above captioned Petition has been sent to the defendant no.1 and defendant no.2 at their registered Email ID: [email protected] and [email protected] vide email dated 17.12.2024. I had emailed a copy of the complete Petition as “Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd. –Vs.- Rinki Dutt & Anr.” 3. That the counsel for the plaintiff has served the defendants with the present petition upon his email id’s: [email protected] and [email protected]. 4. The captioned case email along with petition has been delivered and not bounced back. -sd- Signature Not Verified Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AMIT Digitally Signed KUMAR SHARMA Signing Date:04.04.2025 By:PURUSHAINDRA 17:04:26 KUMAR KAURAV DEPONENT.” 2. The e-mail has been sent on the address which is forming part of the agreement. Even service through courier has already been affected. 3. In view of the aforesaid, the Court finds that the service upon the respondents stands complete. 4. The facts of the case would indicate that the instant petition under Secti