Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-04-09

IC 79276P MAJ. MANOHAR MISHRA vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-4583/2025 2025:DHC:2632-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
IC 79276P MAJ. MANOHAR MISHRA
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 4583/2025, CM APPL. 21227/2025 & CM APPL. 21228/2025 IC 79276P MAJ. MANOHAR MISHRA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shree Prakash Sinha, Mr. Anand Kumar, Mr. Gurdeep Dass and Mr. Rishabh Kumar, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Major Anish Muralidhar, Army CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL ORDER (ORAL) % 09.04.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed in apparent oblivion of the parameters of certiorari jurisdiction, which we exercise while dealing with orders passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal1. 2. In order to remind the parties of the scope of certiorari jurisdiction, we may reproduce the following paragraphs from the judgment of the Supreme Court in Syed Yakoob v K.S. Radhakrishnan2: 1 “AFT” hereinafter 2 AIR 1964 SC 477 W.P.(C) 4583/2025 7. The question about the limits of the jurisdiction of High Courts in issuing a writ of certiorari under Article 226 has been frequently considered by this Court and the true legal position in that behalf is no longer in doubt. A writ of certiorari can be issued for correcting errors of jurisdiction committed

IC 79276P MAJ. MANOHAR MISHRA vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. · Niyam