DR. BALAJI ASHOK BHISE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND ORS

1. The State of Maharashtra 2. The Director of Medical Education 3. The Commissioner, State CET Cell, Mumbai 4. The Commissioner, Health Services 5. The Director of Health Services 6. Dr. Vikas Raghunath Dukare 7. Dean, Government Medical College …Respondents *** Mr. A. S. Khandeparkar, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Vikas Kolekar, Mr. Kunal Shirgire & Mr. Rohit Kamble for the Petitioner. Mrs. Ashwaini A. Purav, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondent Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5 & 7 Mr. Sameer Khandekar for the Respondent No. 3 Mr. S. R. Ghanavat a/w. Mr. Ratan L. Adhe i/b. Mr. Mahesh K. Bhosale for the Respondent No. 6 *** CORAM : A. S. CHANDURKAR & M. M. SATHAYE, JJ. DATED : 03rd APRIL 2025 JUDGMENT (Per M. M. SATHAYE, J): 1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner is challenging the Post Graduate (PG) Medical Course admission process for ‘In-service’ category and seeking directions to the Respondents to reserve a seat for the Petitioner for ‘M.D. Medicine’. The Petitioner is also seeking compensation of Rs.2.00 Crore from the Respondents. akn 1 WP-1998-2025 C2.doc 2. The case of the Petitioner is as under:- 2.1 The Petitioner is doctor, who has complete