DEEPAK VERMA vs THE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI

Judgment text excerpt

$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 07.04.2025 + BAIL APPLN. 415/2025 & CRL.M.A. 2929/2025 DEEPAK VERMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jitender Kumar, Advocate. versus THE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for the State with SI Vijay Kumar and HC Sumit from PS Cyber Dwarka CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Learned prosecutor has filed updated status report dated 05.04.2025, which is accepted across the board, to be scanned and made part of the file. Copy supplied. Arguments heard. 2. At the outset, learned APP on instructions of Investigating Officer/SI Vijay Kumar submits that the accused/applicant has not been responding clearly to the questions and is evasive, therefore, no further indulgence may be granted. 3. On behalf of accused/applicant, the only argument advanced by BAIL APPLN. 415/2025 Page 1 of 4 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH GIRISH KATHPALIA KATHPALIA Date: 2025.04.07 17:43:00 -07'00' Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:07.04.2025 18:18:12 learned counsel is that the accused/applicant is not aware of anything about the registration of the case and the investigation. Learned counsel for accused/applicant submits that accused/applicant is innocent and apart from this, he has nothing else to address. 4. On the other hand, learned APP has taken me through record in support of her contention that the investigation is at nascent stage and the accused/applicant is not cooperating with investigation. It is submitted by learned APP that according to investigation carried so far, the accused/applicant shifted SIM card of the mobile phone from one IMEI number to another IMEI number but the accused/applicant is not disclosing to whom he transferred t