CHARANJEET SINGH vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION DELHI AND ORS

Judgment text excerpt

$~51 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 3rdApril, 2025 + CM(M) 402/2025 CHARANJEET SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohd. Faisal with Mr. Abdul Qadir, Advocates. versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION DELHI AND ORS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Kunal Rawat, Advocate for R-1 and 2. Ms. Sangeeta Bharti, SC. Mr. Ripudaman Bhardwaj with Mr. Kushagra Kumar and Mr. Abhinav Bhardwaj and Mr.Amit Kumar, Advocates. Ms. Sweety Singh with Mr. Sudipta Singh Roy, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) Petitoiner 1. Petitioner had filed a suit for permanent and mandatory injunction. He claimed himself to be the owner and in possession of property bearing Khasra No. 273, Khewt No. 406 situated in the Revenue Estate of Village Sakdarpur, Near Shivaji Park, Shahdara, Delhi. 2. When the above said suit was taken up by the learned Trial Court on 11.09.2024, it directed status quo to be maintained, till next date of hearing. 3. However, when the matter was taken up for further consideration on Signature Not Verified CM(M) 402/2025 1 Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:04.04.2025 15:16:31 14.10.2024, one advocate representing RWA, Shivaji Park appeared and expressed its inclination to move an application under Order I Rule 10 CPC seeking their impleadment in the above said suit. It also produced one order passed by this Court on 02.09.2014 in RSA No. 120/2014. 4. Learned Trial Court, while also taking on record submission made by such to the effect that the suit property was a public street, directed vacation of interim order. 5. Such order is under challenge. 6. According to learned counsel for plaintiff/petitioner, the Court has unfettered power to vacate the interim order but his grievance is merely limited to the effect that