BRUSHMAN INDIA LTD. vs M/S FRAMEWORK INTERIORS

Judgment text excerpt

$~58 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 24th April, 2025 + CM(M) 734/2025 & CM APPL. 24010-24011/2025 BRUSHMAN INDIA LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Shobhana Takiar and Mr. Kuljeet Singh, Advocates. versus M/S FRAMEWORK INTERIORS .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioner Company is defending execution and is aggrieved by order dated 20.12.2024. 2. Ms. Shobhana Takiar, learned counsel for petitioner submits that in terms of liberty granted by this Court, the petitioner herein moved an application before the learned Executing Court seeking waiver of cost of Rs. 45,000/-. However, while disallowing such application, the petitioner company has further been burdened with another cost of same amount, for the reason that there is non-compliance of order passed by this Court. 3. Such order is under challenge. 4. I have seen order dated 19.09.2024 in CM(M) No. 731/2017, 738/2017 and 739/2017 when it was pointed out that there was issuance of Show Cause Notice to the Managing Director and the other two Directors of the Judgment Debtor Company(J D Company) as to why they should not be sent to civil prison for three months and simultaneously they were burdened with cost of Rs. 45,000/- . While disposing of the abovesaid petitions, this Court observed as under in para No.12:- Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CM(M) 734/2025 1 By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:24.04.2025 19:34:05 “12. Keeping in mind the averments made today by the learned counsel for both the sides and the impugned order dated 02.06.2017, only to the extent whereby show cause notice was directed to be issued against the Directors stand set aside, all the three petitions are disposed of with the following directions: - (i