Delhi High Court · 2025-04-21
BRIJ KISHOR MISHRA vs THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ORS.
- Citation / case number
- CRL.M.C.-3480/2022 2025:DHC:2755
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Petitioner
- BRIJ KISHOR MISHRA
- Respondent
- THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ORS.
Judgment text excerpt
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 21.04.2025 + CRL.M.C. 3480/2022, CRL.M.A. 14606/2022, CRL.M.A. 23002/2024 BRIJ KISHOR MISHRA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Nahata, Advocate versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, APP for the State IO Insp Deepak Sharma from PS Nariana. Mr. Kamran Malik, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA JUDGMENT DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J 1. By way of this petition preferred under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [hereafter „Cr.P.C.‟], the petitioner seeks setting aside of the order dated 22.03.2021, passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House Court [hereafter „Trial Court‟] in New Case No. 47646/016 titled „State vs. Pradeep Bajaj‟, as well as the order dated 09.09.2021, passed by the learned Principal District & Sessions Judge, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi CRL.M.C. 3480/2022 Page 1 of 9 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:ZEENAT PRAVEEN Signing Date:21.04.2025 20:24:38 [hereafter „Sessions Court‟] in Criminal Revision Petition No. 240/2021. 2. A brief outline of the facts, leading to the filing of present petition are that the FIR No. 154/2011, was registered on 18.09.2011 at Police Station Naraina, Delhi for the offences punishable under Sections 325/341/509/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [hereafter „IPC‟], on the complaint of the present petitioner, against accused persons namely Pradeep Bajaj, Satvinder Singh and Sonu Bajaj. After completion of investigation, chargesheet was filed against the accused persons. Vide order dated 12.10.2012, charge was framed against the accused persons for offence under Sections 325/341/ 509/34 of IPC, and summons were issued to the witnesses.