BALLAM TRIFLA SINGH vs GYAN PRAKASH SHUKLA AND ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

927-CRA-189-2025(2).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.189 OF 2025 Ballam Trifla Singh …Applicant Versus Gyan Prakash Shukla & Ors. …Respondents _______________________________________________________________ Mr. Ranjit Thorat, Senior Advocate i/b Ms. Pratibha Shelke, for the Applicant. Mr. Vijay Kurle a/w Ms. Bhagyesha Kurane. Mr. Anand A. Pande, for the Respondent No.1. Ms. R. S. Tendulkar, APP for the Respondent – State. Mr. S. K. Dhekale, Court Receiver, High Court, Bombay, present. _______________________________________________________________ CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED: 9th APRIL 2025 JUDGMENT: 1. On 4th April 2025, I have heard submissions of Mr. Ranjit Thorat, learned Senior Advocate i/b Ms. Pratibha Shelke, learned Advocate on behalf of the Applicant and Mr. Anand A. Pande, learned Advocate appearing for the Respondent No.1. The submission of both the learned Advocate were heard completely on 4th April 2025. 2. The impugned orders in this Civil Revision Application are arising out of the Obstructionist proceedings. The Applicant – Obstructionist is the son of the Defendant No.3 i.e. Judgment Debtor. Both the Courts recorded the concurrent findings that the Applicant has produced manipulated and fabricated documents. Therefore, after hearing both the parties this Court expressed that apart from dismissal of Civil Revision Application with exemplary cost, drastic orders are required to Vaibhav Page No. 1 927-CRA-189-2025(2).doc be passed and therefore Mr. Ranjit Thorat, learned Senior Advocate took time to take instructions of withdrawal of the Civil Revision Application. Accordingly, on 4th April 2025, time was granted for taking instructions regarding withdrawal of the Civil Revision