AZAD KAUR vs STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~76 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 07.04.2025 ,,,,,,,,,, + CRL.M.C. 2329/2025 AZAD KAUR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Yashwant Gahlot, Advocate. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa, APP with SI Anju, PS-Sagarpur. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA JUDGMENT (ORAL) RAVINDER DUDEJA, J. CRL.M.A. 10461/2025 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 2329/2025 1. This is a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita CRL.M.C. 2329/2025 Page 1 of 7 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SUNITA KUMARI Signing Date:14.04.2025 14:30:56 [“BNSS”], 2023 (under Section 482 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1973) [“Code”] for quashing of the order dated 12.09.2024, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Dwarka, whereby, the revision filed by the petitioner against the order of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate dated 09.11.2023 has been dismissed. 2. The facts relevant for the disposal of the present petition, briefly stated, are that petitioner filed a complaint under Section 200 of the Code against respondents No. 2 to 9 for the offences punishable under Sections 307/323/352/354/354-B/447/448/451/452/506/509/34 IPC with the allegations that petitioner’s son Pankaj, got married with respondent No. 2 Deepti and after sometime of their marriage, Deepti started quarrelling with her son and pressurized him to live separately from his parents on a separate floor of the same building. Out of love and affection, she allowed her son and Deepati to reside on the second floor of her house but respondent No. 2 started generating pressure on her and her husband to transfer